A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §122

§.VIII POSTERIUS: The prior shift favors Calvinists no more than the invariatus — they confess true presence, distribution, and exhibiting signs

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

The second point we must prove — that the change, especially the prior one, favors the Calvinian sense no more than the unvaried article itself does — comes clear this way.

Calvin, counted among the Reformed doctors, and with him all the Reformed churches, admit a true presence and a true distribution of Christ's body and blood in the holy Supper, no less than a true exhibition.

And because of that exhibition, which they never fail to press, they confess the sacramental signs to be not bare signs only, but also exhibiting signs.

Fair enough. But the charge runs: under the Variata's words, where body and blood are said only to be exhibited, not to be present and distributed, Calvinists can more easily hide a merely spiritual exhibition — saying truly exhibited while teaching exhibited only spiritually.

Latin

POSTERIUS verò à nobis probandum, scil. mutationem praesertim priorem, Calvinianae Sententiae nullâ ex parte magis favere, quam ipse Articulus invariatus ei favet, sic illucescit: Quia cumprimis Calvinus, Reformatorum Doctoribus annumeratus, & cum Calvino Reformatae Ecclesiae omnes, & veram praesentiam, & veram distributionem Corporis & Sanguinis Christi, in S. Coena admittunt, non minùs quam veram exhibitionem, istasque propter hanc, quam nusquam non inculcant seriò, Signa Sacramentalia, non nude Significantia, sed & Exhibentia, confessi. Justas: At, sub Variatae Confessionis verbis, quibus Corpus & Sanguis Christi, nudè exhiberi, non autem adesse & distribui dicuntur, occultare facilius Calvinianos sententiam suam de Spirituali Corporis & Sanguinis Christi exhibitione posse, ut dum exhiberi ista dicunt verè, Spiritualiter duntaxat exhiberi doceant?

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.