A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §123

§.VIII close: Same spiritual reading fits the Invariata; its confessors allow spiritual presence; Reformed teach sacramental, not bare spiritual or corporal

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Answer. First, they can do the same with the Invariata's words: while it says Christ's body and blood are truly present and distributed, they may take that as only spiritual presence and distribution.

Second, even confessors of the Invariata alone do not deny spiritual presence and distribution any more than spiritual exhibition and eating — especially since they also insist that their own corporal presence, distribution, eating, and exhibition are nonetheless hyperphysical and supernatural.

Third, the Reformed do not teach a naked spiritual presence, distribution, and exhibition of Christ's body and blood, but a sacramental one as well — though not a corporal one, which neither Augsburg Confession teaches, earlier or later.

Latin

Resp. (1.) Idem facere posse Calvinianos in verbis Invariatae Confessionis, ut dum dicunt: Corpus & Sanguinem Christi verè adesse & distribui, illa spiritualiter tantum adesse & distribui intelligant. (2.) Etiam invariatae solius Confessores, Spiritualem praesentiam pariter atque distributionem, haud magis quàm Exhibitionem ac Manducationem Spiritualem, inficiari, praesertim cum & suam Corporalem praesentiam, Distributionem, Manducationem & Exhibitionem, hyperphysicas nihilominus & Supernaturales inculcent esse. (3.) Non nudam Spiritualem praesentiam, Distributionem & Exhibitionem Corporis & Sanguinis Christi docere Reformatos, sed & Sacramentalem, licèt non Corporalem, utpote in neutra Confessione Augustana, nec in priori magis, quàm posteriori, edoctam.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.