A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §659

Annotatio V §.VIII open: Secunda Probatio — Oral tied to faith-foundation via solatii succus alone

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

§.VIII: the Author’s second Anti-Irenic proof tied Oral eating to the faith-foundation by the juice of solace alone sought in that eating.

Strimesius had shown that juice cannot flow from Oral — on the Author’s own hypothesis Oral is common to the unworthy, so it yields not even a drop of solace.

Latin

§. VIII. Secunda Probatio Autoris, quâ Oralem Manducationem, fundamento fidei innexam, in Anti-Irenico suo Tractatu docuerat, à SOLO SUCCO SOLATII petita erat, in hac Manducatione ab eo quæsito repositóque; Cùm verò Succum hunc ex Orali Manducatione haudquaquam fluere per id ostendissem, quòd hæc impiis, seu indignè manducantibus, ex hypothesi Autoris, communis est, ne guttulam quidem solatii, nedum integrum succum suppeditatura.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.