A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §622

Annotatio IV §.XXIV: rebuttal (2)–(3) — Trelcatius true text; REAL not CORPORAL; sacramental-spiritual mode vs local/gross

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Rebuttal (2): the alleged Trelcatius line ‘neither local nor illocal on earth’ is not there — Trelcatius says the body is circumsriptively in heaven yet present in the Supper sacramentally / spiritually (pp. 185–186).

Rebuttal (3): all that talk targets only corporal/local/gross presence in/with/under the bread. Trelcatius: the presence is REAL, not CORPORAL (Ambrose: touched by faith, not body); the mode is SACRAMENTAL and SPIRITUAL, not transubstantiation, impanation, or local inclusion — and those authors would subscribe every real spiritual supernatural celestial presence and exhibition.

Latin

Etiam (2) Non omnia in Autoribus leguntur quæ in iis exstare innuit Vir Clarissimus, exempli gratiâ, in Trelcatio: Nec locali, nec illocali modo corpus Christi in terra præsens esse, haud exstat, quandoquidem Trelcatii verba ita sonant; Cùm enim Christi corpus, nostro homoousion, in Cœlo, ubicunque vult, circumscriptivè sit, (puta ex natura corporis, quòd in loco, i.e. alio corpore, non potest aliter, quam circumscriptive adesse) non per modum invisibilem, incircumscriptum, (puta vel absolutè & simpliciter talem, seu infinitum (qui solius Dei est) vel indefinitum, (seu definitivum, Angelis à Scholasticis essentialem habitum) qui modi omnes & singuli veritatem corporis evertunt (utpote vel DEO, vel Angelis proprii & essentiales adæquatè) omnino Christum corporaliter in Cœlo, Corpore tamen in Cœna, modo sacramentali, i. e. spirituali, adesse fatendum est. pag. m. 185. 186.; Etiam (3) quicquid vel de intentionali, vel effectiva Corporis Christi in Cœna præsentia Auctorum nonnulli; vel alii de distantia Corporis Christi à Cœna, haud minori, quàm quæ Cœlum inter & terram obtinet; vel pars de ipsâ absentiâ Corporis Christi à Cœna; vel denique Trelcatius, de tàm affirmato circumscriptivo in cœlis Corporis Christi præsentiæ modo, quam negato incircumscriptivo in terris adessendi ejusdem modo, tradunt, id omne soli corporali, locali, crassóque Corporis Christi, vel in, vel cum, vel sub pane Eucharistiæ adessendi modo oppositum cupiunt: Nam, inquit Trelcatius; Cordibus eorum re verâ præsens Christus est, iis, qui credunt, eâdem omnino præsentiâ qualis & Communio Corporis sui ipsis exhibetur in Cœna. Atque hæc præsentia REALIS est, neutra tamen præsentia CORPORALIS. Nam fide, ut ait Ambrosius, tangitur Christus, non Corpore. Edit. Leidens. pag 184. in medio. Et paucis intersertis: Modus, ait, præsentiæ Corporis Christi in Cœna non CORPORALIS, NATURALIS AUT LOCALIS, sive per conversionem totius substantiæ panis & vini, in Corpus & Sanguinem Domini; sive per IMPANATIONEM aut INCLUSIONEM LOCALEM; sive denique per INEXISTENTIAM aut indistántiam, puta Corporalem & Localem: Sed SACRAMENTALIS & SPIRITUALIS est, quam efficit Dei voluntas & Auctoritas, verbis institutionis declarata: pag. 185. init. cæteroquin omni Reali, Spirituali, Supernaturali Cœlestique Corporis Christi veri & substantialis, tam Præsentiæ, quàm Exhibitioni, toto animo subscripturi Auctores dicti.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio section I tip (Schrey & Hartmann 1708) (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio §II + Crimina heads + Part I Protheoria densify (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio Crimina defenses densify (IV + Crimina I–II opening) (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina defenses pages 44-56 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Crimina II rem + Crimina III + Cassel Art. III–V densify (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 57-75 (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 56-75 (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Obices/Officia/Historia/gradus densify (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria body pages 114-120 (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Formula Discord / Digressio / Bossuet / Disparitas densify (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex densify (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Coena Domini body start densify (Q.I–II / Precariae Hypotheses) (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Post Lutherum Providentia Controv. III opening densify (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Post Lutherum pages 141-155 (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Post Lutherum pages 141-144 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. VI Reprobation densify (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III densify (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Hexades Prooemium PDF pages 179-186 (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Hexades Prooemium pages 182-186 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.I–§.IV densify (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 186-198 (Latin)
Checked print Tesseract Hexades Annotatio I pages 186-193 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.V–§.VII densify (Latin)
Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 192-205 (Latin)
Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.VIII densify (Latin)

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.