A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §599

Annotatio IV §.XX: presence only SACRAMENTALLY AND SPIRITUALLY — ‘here or there’ corporal claim = false prophets

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

(2) With and in the bread the body is only SACRAMENTALLY AND SPIRITUALLY — not with heaven’s essential/accidental properties; the faithful mind attends to what is at the Father’s right, suspending material-substance fixation.

After Danhauer’s ‘consensus’ quotes they add: those who after Christ’s corporal departure say ‘here or there (in the bread) is Christ’ He Himself calls false prophets. (3) ‘Body in the bread’ they almost endlessly gloss as body in the Sacrament SPIRITUALLY.

Latin

(2) Addunt, cum & in pane, esse tantum SACRAMENTALITER ET SPIRITUALITER, non autem communibus proprietatibus, tam essentialibus, quàm Accidentalibus consequentibus, quale tantùm ad dextram patris in Cœlo sit & ad quod omnis fidelis in mente debeat attendere, suspensâ consideratione circa naturam Materialis substantiæ sacramenti: Disertius adhuc idem, paulò post verba, à Danhauero, pro Waldensium cum Lutheranis consensu, in medium adducta, ita profitentes; Annon Christus ipsemet eos qui eum, post abitum illius corporalem, in terris corporaliter præsentem profitentur, dicentes, hic aut illic (in pane) est Christus, vocat Pseudoprophetas, à quibus diligenter cavendis suos præmonet. (3) Esse in pane Corpus Christi, tantum non innumeris in locis exponunt per tô esse corpus Christi in Sacramento SPIRITUALITER.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.