A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §523

Annotatio IV §.VIII open: Fourth century — Nicene Fathers’ complexus and the Marchic Reformed formula

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

§.VIII: stepping into the FOURTH century, first remember the Nicene Fathers’ complexus — opening the whole Church’s sentence on the Sacred Supper.

Our Marchic Reformed administration formula seems drawn from it: communicants must not cling to the sensed symbols, but lift the mind’s eyes to heaven and by divine faith hold that souls are fed by Christ’s true substantial body and blood no less than the mouth takes the symbols.

Latin

§. VIII. Ad QUARTI SECULI Testimonia excutienda pedem promoturus, non possum non meminisse primo omnium locô præstantissimi hujusmodi Testimoniorum complexûs, PATRUM NICÆNORUM verbis concepti, totiusque Ecclesiæ ejus temporis christianæ de S. cœna sententiam aperientis; tantóque magis meminisse, quantò certiùs Formulæ administrandi Cœnam S., in Ecclesiis nostris Reformatis Marchicis aliisque receptæ, verba, administrationem ipsam immediatè antecedentia, complexui isti accepta ferenda videntur, quibus nempe Communicantes admonentur, cogitationibus suis non usque adeò Symbolis Sacris, in S. Cœna sensibus evidentissimè expositis, inhærere, sed verò oculos mentis in Cœlum dirigere, certòque certiùs, quin fide divina, statuere atque tenere, animas suas non minus ipso corpore sanguineque Christi veris ac substantialibus, saginari, quàm Symbola S. ore corporis à se assumantur ac percipiantur.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.