A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §407

Annotatio II §.IX (2): First Institution — body at table, not in bread; else two bodies / self-eating

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

(2) At the first Institution Christ’s body was corporally at the table — so not corporally in the bread.

If it was in the bread while He Himself ate with the disciples (Matt. 26:29; Mark 14:25), He ate His own flesh in and under the bread — whole body and soul in His mouth — hence either multiplication of one body, or two bodies (one eating, one eaten).

Latin

(2) Circumstantiis primæ Institutionis: Corpus enim Christi fuit tum temporis corporaliter ad mensam, seu mensæ corporaliter accubuit, adeoque Corporaliter in pane non fuit. Item, quòd si corpus Christi corporaliter in pane tum fuit, cùm Christus Sacramentum Coenæ instituturus, ipsemet panem cum discipulis edit. Matth. 26. 29. Marc. 14. 25. sequetur, eundem in & sub pane, suam propriam carnem comedisse; adeoque totum suum corpus & animam, tum temporis in ore habuisse: hincque adeo, vel multiplicationem esse factam ejusdem corporis Christi, vel duo Christum habuisse corpora, unum continens & comedens, alterum contentum & comesum.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.