A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §345

Annotatio I §.IV: Synecdoche Grammar vs Rhetoric; Mansfeld’s Calvinian vs Lutheran metonymy

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

On synecdoche, Selneccer, Luther, and countless others distinguish Grammatical from Rhetorical synecdoche — a distinction that sins against Grammar for anyone not still wet behind the ears.

Call it Grammatical or not: synecdoche remains a trope, like metonymy, metaphor, or irony.

Mansfeld grants metonymy in both halves of the Institution, yet under a rather ridiculous split between Calvinian sign/thing-signified metonymy and Lutheran effect-for-cause / container-for-content metonymy.

Latin

Ex posterioribus, quà Synechdochen, praeter Selneccerum ipsumque Lutherum, innumeri alii, cum distinctione tamen inter Synechdochen Grammaticam & Rhetoricam, cujus Distinctionis applicatione ad praesentem materiam, quantum in Grammaticam peccetur, vel illi norunt, qui nondum aere lavantur. Nam ubi quaeso traditur in Grammaticis Synecdoche, pro quali contendunt Theologi hi? Quanquam Synecdoche, sive Grammatica dicatur, sive alio veniat nomine, tropus tamen ac figura remanet, juxta ac metonymia, metaphora aut ironia: Id quod docet tropi natura, nominis dissimulatione haud tollenda nec mutanda, cùm ipsa re obtinetur. Quà Metonymiam autem, Mansrafius in Erotematibus ad articulos quatuor Visitatorios, non minus in propositione definitiva partis prioris Sacrae Coenae, quàm posterioris ista: Hoc poculum, est N. T. in sanguine meo, metonymiam largiturus, sed sub distinctione satis ridicula inter Metonymiam Calvinianam de signo & signato, & Metonymiam Lutheranam, quâ uti effectus pro causa ponitur, in hac propositione: Poculum est Testamentum in sanguine meo, i. e. sanguis in poculo est illud quo sancitum est N. T., id est promissio remissionis peccatorum; ita Continens pro contento in hac: Hic panis est Corpus meum.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.