A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §338

Annotatio I §.III: Scultetus grants tropum in the Cup words but denies consequence for the rest — Strimesius replies

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Scultetus, in his recent Discussion of Reformed Universalism, grants a trope in those second-part Institution words, yet denies the consequence for the rest of the Eucharist Institution.

Proper sense, he says, is kept everywhere unless a grave cause blocks it — and in This is my body, he claims, there is none.

Strimesius notes he already agrees the Cup proposition is built of more than one trope, and all the more once Heb. 9:17, 20 shows it emulates Moses’ This is the blood of the N.T.

Latin

Nec abnuet Lutheranus quivis, certè non Dominus Daniel Severinus Scultetus in Discussione Universalismi Reformati adhuc recenti, consequentiam interim abnuens: Ponam inquit, in his verbis (partis scil. Institutionis sacrae Coenae, secundae, seu posterioris) esse tropum, non sunt eam ob causam reliqua ad Sacrae Eucharistiae institutionem pertinentia tropicè accipienda. Proprius enim verborum sensus ubivis est retinendus, ni gravis obstet causa, quae hic, scilicet in propositione prioris Partis: Hoc est corpus meum, nulla est. Quibus verbis, uti mihi consenserit Clariss. vir, propositionem Eucharisticam: Hoc poculum est N. T. in sanguine meo, tropô non uno constare, tantôque magis consenserit, non nude posuerit, quantô ex Hebr. cap. 9. vers. 17. & 20. magis annotaverit, modum hunc loquendi aemulari formulam dicendi Mosis, cùm populum totum expiaret, & sanguine aspergeret, ita sonantem: Hic est sanguis N. T. à Deo injuncti;

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.