A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §15

Prefatio Crimina III close: Prayer for the adversary, Cassmann's rule for disputers, and Meldenius against self-appointed judges

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

As for what remains: I humbly beseech God that He would deign to pour into this adversary of mine (than whom no one ever experienced a more hostile man — irritated by not so much as a little letter, nor even by mention of his name anywhere) the Spirit of proving himself, by which he may understand and attain how great the sins with which he loads himself by the most petulant tearing of the fame both of me and of so many other excellent and pious Men devoted to the Lutheran Society — whether through most imprudent zeal, or through a hunt for his own fame, truly quite infamous, sought from men like himself — and may timely unload himself of them by serious repentance, lest Satan — not indeed a Calvinistic one (whom the Sacred page utterly ignores), but the infernal and first author of calumnies and contumelies — be able any longer to harm him and his soul, redeemed by the precious Blood of Christ, and be forever severed from the Evangelicals' Union, otherwise still most hateful to him.

Meanwhile let him note the following Rule spoken by someone to unjust Disputers: Not by reviling, but by entreating; not by fulminating, but by demonstrating; not by condemning, but by confirming; not by execrating, but by praying; not by striking, but by admonishing; not by dooming with dire imprecations, but by interceding with pious vows; not by attacking with curses, but by earning favor with good deeds; not by hateful windbags of words, but by unmoved testimonies of Holy Scripture; not by truculence, but by tolerance; not by agitation of minds, but by moderation of affections; not by force, but by gentleness; not by inhumanity, but by mildness; not by desire of revenge, but by will to gain the erring; not by clamor, but by love of the right — emerging from every Fanatics' Sophistry and fraud as from dense darkness, conquering Truth at last triumphs as victor, and will triumph forever, altogether to triumph at last. In Otto Cassmann, Schol. Tentat. I, p. 374.

And also the Admonition of Meldenius, a Lutheran Theologian, addressing all such Dictator-Theologians in these words: You have constituted yourselves not only Adversaries but Judges; you rashly condemn other Churches dissenting from You; you arrogate to Yourselves censure over any Theologians whatsoever, however well deserving of the Church, and over their pious labors; without blush you publicly arraign them as guilty of the foulest heresies; and thus most manifestly you affect a certain dominion over the Lord's inheritance, so that your πολυπραγμοσύνη (meddlesome busyness) becomes conspicuous to the whole World, and to all good men is rendered hateful and intolerable. Who designated You Judges of nearly all Controversies? who Censor of all books? who Aristarchuses even of all Theological phrases? as if you alone were wise, and all the rest wandered about like shadows? as if You, ignorant of every error, had been destined by God and the Universal Church to that office, that you should examine all others' sayings and writings most rigidly and with Lyncean acumen! Who finally permitted You more Right over others than others over You? why did you publicly provoke those by whom you had never been injured? If you had kept silence, you would not have betrayed yourselves like the hamster, and would have consulted best for your fame. And indeed you urge these Controversies with such bitterness of words, hauling wagons of insults from both sides and from every side, that no Apostolic gentleness can be found in you. Nay — what is far graver and least to be borne — you often violently twist even things spoken aptly, piously, and rightly into an alien and perverse sense, and thence boldly snatch occasion for shameless calumny, and fasten upon the innocent monsters of opinions of which they had never dreamed. If this license of cavilling should obtain, who at last will be innocent, who at last will be orthodox under these fault-findings? Christian Charity always hopes better things; your suspicion always thinks worse. Votive Exhortation for the peace of the Church, p. 34.

Latin

Quod reliquum est, Deum supplex veneror, dignetur huic adversario meo (quo nemo hostiliorem expertus quisquam unquam est, nulla sc. literula, ne nominis quidem mentione ullibi facta, a se irritatum) Spiritum probationis sui ipsius infundere, quo intelligat et assequatur, quantis se peccatis, tam mei, quam tot aliorum egregiorum piorumque Virorum, Lutheranae Societati addictorum, petulantissima famae dilaceratione, sive per imprudentissimum zelum, sive per famae propriae, profecto admodum infame, ab hominibus sui similibus quaesitum aucupium, constituat onustum, iisque semet ipsum, per seriam poenitentiam, tempestive exoneret, ne Satanas — non utique Calvinisticus (quem Sacra pagina penitus ignorat), sed infernalis et calumniarum contumeliarumque autor primus — ei animaeque ejus, Sanguine Christi pretioso redemptae, nocere amplius queat, ab Unione alioquin Evangelicorum, sibi adhuc exosissima, aeternum sejungendus. Interim notet Regulam iniquis Disputatoribus ab aliquo dictam sequentem: Non convitiando, sed obtestando; non fulminando, sed demonstrando; non condemnando, sed confirmando; non execrando, sed precando; non caedendo, sed monendo; non diris imprecationibus devovendo, sed piis votis intercedendo; non maledictis incessendo, sed benefactis demerendo; non odiosis verborum ampullis, sed immotis S. Scripturae testimoniis; non truculentia, sed tolerantia; non animorum commotione, sed affectuum moderatione; non vi, sed mansuetudine; non immanitate, sed lenitate; non vindictae cupiditate, sed errantes lucrifaciendi voluntate; non clamore, sed recti Amore — ex omni Fanaticorum Sophistica et fraude, velut ex densis tenebris, emergens vincit tandem aeternumque victura triumphat victrix veritas, omnino tandem triumphatura. Apud Ottonem Cassmannum, Schol. Tentat. I. p. 374. Necnon Admonitionem Meldenii, Theologi Lutherani, omnes hujusmodi Dictatores Theologos his verbis alloquentis: Non solum Adversarios, sed Judices Vosmet ipsos constituistis, alias Ecclesias a Vobis dissentientes temere damnatis, censuram in quosvis Theologos, quantumvis optime de Ecclesia meritos, eorumque pios labores, Vobis arrogatis, teterrimarum haeresium sine rubore, publice reos peragitis, et sic manifestissime dominium quoddam in hereditatem Domini affectatis, ut πολυπραγμοσύνη vestra Universo Mundo conspicua, omnibus vero bonis reddatur exosa et intolerabilis. Quis Vos designavit Judices pene omnium Controversiarum? quis Censor omnium librorum? quis Aristarchos omnium etiam phrasium Theologicarum? quasi vos soli sapiatis; reliqui omnes velut umbrae vagentur? quasi Vos omnis erroris nescii, ad id muneris destinati sitis a Deo et Universa Ecclesia, ut omnium aliorum dicta scriptaque rigidissime et Lyncaeo acumine examinetis! Quis tandem plus Juris Vobis in alios, quam aliis in Vos permisit? cur lacessivistis eos publice a quibus laesi nunquam fuistis? Si tacuissétis, vosmet ipsos, joricum instar, non prodissétis, vestrae famae optime consuluissetis. Et has quidem Controversias tanta verborum acerbitate urgetis, convitiorum etiam plaustra utrinque et undique convehentes, ut nulla mansuetudo Apostolica in vobis deprehendi possit. Imo, quod longe gravius minimeque ferendum, saepe etiam commode, pie recteque dicta in alienum et perversum sensum violenter detorquetis, indeque occasionem audacter calumniandi sine fronte arripitis, et innocentibus monstra opinionum de quibus illi nunquam somniaverant, affingitis. Quae cavillandi licentia si obtineat, quis tandem insons erit, quis tandem momis istis orthodoxus erit? Charitas Christiana semper meliora sperat; vestra suspicio semper deteriora cogitat. Paraenesi Votiva pro pace Ecclesiae, p. 34.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.