Theological Theses · §1298

Ames and Crocius: sin that wastes the conscience vs sin that does not

Reformed schools (Ames, Crocius) split sins that waste the conscience from those that do not.

Conscience-wasting sin cannot share true piety; infirmity-slips can remain in a godly good conscience.

Latin

XXI. Huc facit distinctio peccati in Reformatorum Scholis usitata, qua distinguitur peccatum in illud quod conscientiam vastat, & in illud quod non vastat conscientiam. Quae distinctio habetur apud Gul. Amesium & Lud. Crocium. Etenim per peccatum vastans conscientiam intelligitur illud quod cum vera pietate, & bona conscientia consistere non potest: per peccatum vero quod non vastat conscientiam, illud quod ex infirmitate & negligentia commissum reperiri potest in eo qui & vere pius est, & bonam habet erga Deum conscientiam. Ames. in Medulla Theologiae, lib. 1. cap. 14. num. 11. Lud. Croc. in Syntag. Sacr. Theolog. lib. 3. cap. 38. num. 23. & 24.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.