A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §96

Rome feared a Protestant confederation; hard Lutherans hated Melanchthon's circle and later irenics

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

The history of the last age shows what Rome's curia, the Imperial court, Spain, and the French clergy under Catherine de' Medici feared most: a sacred confederation of Protestants.

How fierce, then, were the passions of the Heshusians, Brentians, Flacians, Formula men of Bergen, and Hunnians? What hatred boiled against gentle Melanchthon — not to name our own — and then against Peucer, his son-in-law, wasted by ten years in prison, against Strigel, and the rest?

They skimmed off waves of rage almost everywhere, even against the best and most moderate princes; and in our own century against the Bishop of Strängnäs, the Calixtines, Dreier's men, the Rinteln theologians, and every brother formed of better clay who would not make the schism everlasting.

To rehearse that here would be needless.

Latin

Docet historia Aevi superioris, quo nihil magis Curia Papalis, Caesarea, Hispanica, & Clerus Gallicanus tempore Catharinae Medicae, formidavit, quàm sacram Confederationem Protestantium. Sed quanti tùm fuerint Heshusianis, Brentianis, Flaccianis, Bergensibus, Hunnianis, animorum motus; quae in suavissimum Melanchthonem (ne nostros dicam) hinc in Peucerum ejus generum, decennali carcere maceratum, in Strigelium, & alios, efferbuerint odia; quos illi passim despumarint irarum propemodùm fluctus, etiam in optimos moderatissimosque Principes; quin nostro seculo in Stregnensem Episcopum, in Calixtinos, Dreieranos, Rintelenses, & quotquot in Viris fratribus, de meliore luto formatis, aeterna dissidia noluerunt, reponere hoc in loco supervacuum foret.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.