A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §721

Annotatio VI §.VI biblical: 1 Cor 11 guilty→eat Oral — reply via apostate guilt (Heb 6/10)

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Biblical press (1 Cor 11:28–29): whoever becomes guilty of the body eats it — if not spiritually, then at least orally — so the Impious eat. Therefore.

Reply: the major is thin — men become guilty of God and of Christ’s body and blood by many abuses without approaching the Eucharist. Apostates are guilty while deserting the sacrament (Heb 6; 10); Impious Christians can be guilty by abusing the sacrament (eating the sign, not the Thing).

Latin

BIBLICUM, in dicto Apostolico 1. Cor. 11. vers. 28. 29. se fundans, ita infert: Quicunque Communicantium, rei fiunt corporis Christi, illi manducant corpus Christi, si non spiritualiter, saltem oraliter, Impii &c. Ergo. Resp. Quam insulsa sit Major, rerum Sacrarum abusus fere quicunque ostendit, quô DEI, Christi, hujusque corporis & sanguinis, rei fiunt homines, Eucharistiam licet haud accedentes. Ab ipso Spiritu S. corporis & sanguinis Christi rei habentur ipsi etiam Apostatae, totum tamen Christianismum, nedum Sacramenta, abominati: Perhibentur enim crucifigere Christum & filium DEI ad ignominiam exponere Hebr. 6, 4. 5. 6. & Cap. 10. filium DEI conculcare & sanguinem fœderis profanum ducere, & Spiritum S. contumelia afficere. Quodsi ergo Apostatae rei fiunt corporis & sanguinis Christi, sacramentum deserendo, qui non rei fieri poterunt eorundem, Impii Christiani, Sacramento abutendo, i. e. manducando Sacramentum corporis & sanguinis Christi, non rem Sacramenti, quâ se privant ipsos, etiam Sacramenti abusu.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.