A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §701

Annotatio VI §.III (1): Scultetus — Judas ate bread of Lord by mouth, not Lord-bread by faith

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Scultetus of Hamburg rises to that Augustine: if Judas was at the feast, he ate the Lord’s bread with the mouth, not the Lord-bread by faith.

Even for Judas the bread was external communion of Christ’s body — Christ said to him as to the rest, “this bread is my body” (Discuss. Univers. Reform. §.258).

Latin

Testimonium hoc Augustini adeò luculentum est, ut etiam Clarissimus Scultetus Hamburgensis eidem assurgat, dicens: Si Judas interfuit S. epulo, manducavit ille panem Domini ORE, non autem panem Dominum per fidem. Addens interim: Ipsi quoque Judæ, panis fuit communio corporis Christi (puta externa): Æque enim Judæ, ac reliquis Apostolis, dictum est à Christo: Non: Hoc, quod cum pane do, sed; Hoc, seu, hic panis, est corpus Christi. Discuss. Univers. Reform. §. 258. pag. 160.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.