Annotatio V §.IV §.6: mandate+medium syllogism fails — not every command/medium absolutely necessary to salvation
The Author’s syllogism — mandate + means ⇒ fundamental Supper article — does not hold. Not every divine command is absolutely necessary to salvation (else who dies before eating the sacramental bread?).
Not every salvation-medium is absolute either — baptized infants die without hearing the word, the ordinary medium.
Latin
Hic equidem vellem, dum Clarissim. Professor me fingit ipsi mihi contradixisse, ipsemet saltem aliquid dixisse videri posset. Quæ enim qualísque quæso Ratiocinatio hæc: Articulus fundamentalis is omnis & solus est, qui in ipsâ Scriptura S. vel expressis verbis, vel per evidentem Consequentiam, ad salutem absolutè necessarius perhibetur; Articulus autem de S. Cœna necessitatem habet mandati, quia injuncta S. Cœna est; Itemque necessitatem Medii, quia Corpus Christi pro nobis datum est, Ergo Articulus de S. Cœna est fundamentalis. Non omnes hîc tangam scopas parum combinatas; hoc solum quæsivero in præsens ex Autore: Num, quodcunque in Scriptura à Deo mandatum est, eóque necessitatem mandati dicitur habere, idcirco vel conceptis verbis, vel per evidentem Consequentiam, ad salutem absolutè necessarium in Script. S. dictum sit? Vel, quod eôdem redit: num omne Mandatum DEI, absolutè necessarium ad salutem sit? Quodsi hoc; quî ergo isti salvabuntur, qui antequam manducant de pane Sacramentali, de quo mandatum est: Edite hoc est Corpus meum, diem suum obeunt? Num omne Medium salutis, absolutè necessarium ad salutem est? Quomodo igitur Infantes, etiam baptizati, salutem consequentur, si in ætate infantili, auditûs verbi divini, ordinarii Salutis medii, incapaces, ex hac vita discedant?
About this text
Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.
English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio section I tip (Schrey & Hartmann 1708) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio §II + Crimina heads + Part I Protheoria densify (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio Crimina defenses densify (IV + Crimina I–II opening) (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina defenses pages 44-56 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Crimina II rem + Crimina III + Cassel Art. III–V densify (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 57-75 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 56-75 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Obices/Officia/Historia/gradus densify (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria body pages 114-120 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Formula Discord / Digressio / Bossuet / Disparitas densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Coena Domini body start densify (Q.I–II / Precariae Hypotheses) (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Post Lutherum Providentia Controv. III opening densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Post Lutherum pages 141-155 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Post Lutherum pages 141-144 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. VI Reprobation densify (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Prooemium PDF pages 179-186 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Hexades Prooemium pages 182-186 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.I–§.IV densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 186-198 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Hexades Annotatio I pages 186-193 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.V–§.VII densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 192-205 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.VIII densify (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.