A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §636

Annotatio V §.III open: Lutherans admit double food/eating — yet extend corporal beyond its sphere

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

§.III: Luther and his namesakes grant a double Supper-food and a double eating — corporal of bread, spiritual of Christ’s Body.

Yet because they grossly hold that nothing but corporal eating is true, they stretch the corporal beyond corporal food’s proper sphere and invent a double corporal eating: one of bread, one of Christ’s Body.

Latin

§. III. Etsi verò Lutherus & quotquot à Luthero denominari gestiunt, cum, duplicem duntaxat in S. Cœna cibum, tùm, ob duplicem hunc cibum, duplicem expositam Manducationem, corporalem panis, & spiritualem Corporis Christi, nulli diffitentur; tamen Corporalem extra objecti sui adæquati, corporalis scil. cibi sphæram, inde extensuri, quod præter corporalem manducationem, veram nullam dari posse, nimis crasse concipiunt, duplicem Corporalem comminiscuntur Manducationem, panis unam, alteram Corporis Christi.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.