A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §615

Annotatio IV §.XXIII: Wren’s Jude 19 elenchus — psychikoi without spirit; they ban spiritual presence, chase only psychic ratio

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Wren turns their dream-fight into Jude 19’s elenchus: they are the separators — psychikoi without the spirit — now more than anyone.

Immersed in matter alone, they execrate every spiritual presence of the Lord’s body, chase only a natural/psychic sacrament-ratio, and either banish the spiritual-divine ratio of the sacrament or exclude themselves (and hope to drive us) from divine participation — Gentile-style, believing only natural twilight.

Latin

Atque hæc jam illa pugna est, quam clamitant, è cujus sibi per somnium fictione, verè sese protrudunt in Elenchum illum Apostoli (ad neminem unquam magis, quam ad ipsos nunc pertinentem,) etoi eisin hoi apodiorizontes, psychikoi, pneuma mē echontes, Judæ vers. 19. Spiritualem enim omnem corporis Dominici præsentiam cùm ipsi execrentur, & materiæ soli miserè immersi, ultra sensum nihil sapiant, nullamque nisi naturalem, atque psychikēn rationem in sacramento sectentur, fortiter sese jam apodiorizontas præstant, sive illud de Rebus interpretandum sit, Potiorem enim Sacramenti rationem, & quæ Spiritualis veréque Divina est, prorsus exulare jubent; sive de Personis, & tum vel semetipsos excludunt (& à Latino quidem Vulgari, Nostrisque sic redditur:) Ethnicorum planè more, non plùs credentes, quàm ex naturali lumine, seu potiùs crepusculo, assequi possunt; vel saltem, posse se Nos exterminare à Participio Divino sperant.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.