A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §592

Annotatio IV §.XIX: Lucawitz — true bread in nature; body sacramentally, really, SPIRITUALLY

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Lucawitz (chief Taborite doctor): the Supper bread is in its nature true bread — the ‘This’ of ‘This is my body’ points to that bread.

With it is Christ’s true body from the Virgin — not material identity, but sacramentally, really, and SPIRITUALLY; reverence for the habitude to Christ’s body, not for bread’s substance as such; not with all essential/accidental properties.

Latin

Parte Primâ Johannes Lucawitz, Taboritarum præcipuus doctor, contra Rokenzanam & Papistas Pragenses, ita de Sacramento Corporis & Sanguinis Christi confitetur: De hoc, ait, Sacramento, istud ex fide scripturæ tenemus & corde sinceriter credimus, quod panis quem Christus in sua Cœna accipiens, suis ad manducandum dedit discipulis, & in ejus digna perceptione per Ministerium fidelium sacerdotum reliquit memoriam suæ passionis, est in natura sua verus panis, qui pronomine, Hoc, demonstratur in hac propositione sacramentali: Hoc est corpus meum, & cum hoc verum corpus Christi de Virgine sumtum & pro nobis traditum, non identicè, non de identitate materiali intelligendo, sed sacramentaliter, realiter & verè, qui propter sui habitudinem ad corpus Christi, in sibi debita habendus est reverentia, & fideles illam venerantur non ut est panis substantia, sed de quanto, ut præmittitur, est corpus Christi, cujus verum corpus in eodem esse veraciter, sacramentaliter, SPIRITUALITER, est credendum. Non autem cum omnibus proprietatibus tam essentialibus quam accidentalibus consequentibus ipsum.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.