A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §570

Annotatio IV §.XV close: not consubstantiation patron — Rupert charges bare sign; more in Annot. 3 — stop

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Some wrongly make Berengar a consubstantiation patron — even Rupert of Deutz (crasser consubstantiation’s chief author) refuses that and instead charges him with wanting a bare sign of the sacred thing.

Rupert attacks truth-confessors as having no argument but that bare-sign claim (ascribed also to Augustine). Rest on Berengar: see above, Annot. 3. Stop before §.XVI / next extract.

Latin

Etsi verò ex his similibusque verbis, perperam à nonnullis, Berengarius Consubstantiationis Fautor & Patronus conjecturari consuevit, tamen annumerandum hisce minimè esse vel ipse Rupertus Abbas Tuitiensis, Consubstantiationis Crassioris Auctor, primus & præcipuus, fateri ultrò nullus verebitur, quando Berengarium non tantum errantium Antesignanum facit, sed & errorem ejus in eo collocat, quod Sacramentum corporis & sanguinis Domini, nudum rei sacræ signum voluerit haberi. Ita enim Rupertus Consubstantiator, Veritatis Confessores oppugnat: Illi autem quid dicant, quid pro argumento afferant, inquit, non habent, nisi quod aliqui ex iis, dum volunt Sacramentum corporis & sanguinis Domini, solummodò signum esse sacræ rei, juxta errorem quondam Berengarii Turonensis … etiam B. Augustinum sentire ita putant (De Sacramento Eucharistico lib. 3. cap. 11. & 15.). Cetera de Berengario dicenda require suprà Annot. 3.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.