A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §466

Annotatio III §.X (4): Faith of the first centuries — if they taught Transsubstantiation, Jews and Gentiles would have hissed at once

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

(4) Faith and praxis of the first centuries: if the earliest Christians had professed Transsubstantiation, none then mistook ‘This is my body / blood.’

That dogma’s rumor would have flown at once to neighboring Jews and Gentiles and met not only contradiction but every hiss — from such fervent mystery-defenders it could not have stayed quiet.

Latin

(4.) Tàm Fidei, quam huic superstructæ praxi, primorum, per multa secula Christianorum: Quodsi enim primævi Christiani Transsubstantiationem professi fuissent, nemine eorum tùm temporis, veri sensus Christi verborum: Hoc est corpus meum, hic est sanguis meus, ignaro existente, quî fieri unquam potuisset, quò minùs ab his, præfervidis alioquin Mysteriarum Religionis suæ propugnatoribus, fama dogmatis, ad eos, quos inter vivebant, Judæos pariter atque Ethnicos, quam velocissimè transiisset citra omnem moram, non contradictiones horum ferias duntaxat, sed & exsibilationes quascunque expertura?

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.