A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §449

Annotatio III §.VIII: Anathema if bread-substance remains — Pius IV profession/oath names Transsubstantiation

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Anathema if anyone says bread and wine substance remain with body and blood, or denies that singular conversion with species alone remaining.

Nor do they delay the Pope’s definition and the Council’s unjust confirmation: profession and oath must follow this Transsubstantiation form — Ego N. … truly, really, substantially body and blood; conversion of whole substances — Pius IV’s bull on the Trent faith-oath.

Latin

Proinde, si quis dixerit in SSmo. Eucharistiæ Sacramento remanere substantiam panis & vini unà cum corpore & sanguine Domini nostri Jesu Christi, negaveritque mirabilem illam & singularem Conversionem totius substantiæ panis in corpus, & totius substantiæ vini in sanguinem, manentibus duntaxat speciebus panis & vini, quam quidem Conversionem Catholica (Romana) Ecclesia aptissimè Transsubstantiationem appellat, Anathema sit. Nec morati Papæ definitionem, Conciliiq; injustam Confirmationem, ut juxta hanc Transsubstantiationis, non aliam formam, professio & juramentum fidei fiat, utque unus hic è novis Symboli Romani articulis sub tenore & pœna frequenti hujusmodi exaudiatur: Ego N. firma fide credo & profiteor omnia & singula, quæ continentur in symbolo fidei, quo S. Romana Ecclesia utitur; … profiteor pariter in Missa atque in Eucharistiæ Sacramento esse verè realiter & substantialiter corpus & sanguinem unà cum anima & divinitate Domini nostri Jesu Christi, fierique conversionem totius substantiæ panis in corpus & totius substantiæ vini in sanguinem Christi, quam Conversionem Catholica (Romana) Ecclesia Transsubstantiationem appellat: vide Bullam Pii IV. Confirm. Concil. Trident. super forma juramenti professionis fidei unà cum eodem Concilio editam.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.