A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §405

Annotatio II §.IX: Marburg determination does not free Luther from corporal-in-bread / subtilior consub

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Marburg’s determination (we have not agreed whether the true body and blood are corporally present in the bread and wine) does not free Luther from corporal presence in or with the bread — nor from subtler Consubstantiation.

Those words confess not presence alone but a corporal mode in the bread itself.

Colophon: watch the difficulties that press corporal-in-bread presence for crassior or subtilior (at least Luther’s) Consubstantiation.

Latin

Utut nulli assequamur, quomodo Lutheri Determinatio Colloquii Marpurgensis, his scil. concepta verbis: (Etsi autem, an verum corpus & Sanguis Christi corporaliter in pane & vino Coenæ Domini præsens sit, hoc tempore non concordavimus &c.) à Corporis Christi præsentia in vel cum pane, corporali, adeoque à subtiliori Consubstantiatione, expediri possit; cum verba ista non præsentiam duntaxat veri Corporis Christi in Coena, sed & modum præsentiæ corporalem, quin corporalem hunc præsentiæ modum, in ipso pane, disertissimè profiteantur. Eoque non possumus non colophonis locô, tribus quod aiunt verbis, innuere, quibus Difficultatibus Corporalem corporis Christi in pane præsentiam, sive soli Crassiori, sive & Subtiliori, saltem Lutheri, Consubstantiationi vindicandam, pressam advertamus.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.