A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §389

Annotatio II NATIVITAS: Guitmund — PANI ET VINO COMMISCENTES; Impanent et Invinent heresy

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Same eleventh century, the other way: Guitmund of Aversa calls the sentence a heresy to smother in the blade.

Beaten from denying Christ’s body in the Lord’s food, some mix Christ with bread and wine and found another heresy — Impanate and Invinate by their own authority.

No prophet, Christ, apostle, or world taught Impanation; the Lord kills Impanators with This is My Body — not In this lies My body.

Latin

Sed & reperias vice versâ, eodem seculo undecimo, qui sententiam hanc hæresin appellarunt & in ipsa herba suffocare annisi sunt, GUITMUNDUM scil. Aversanum, de exortu modò dictae sententiae, ita scribentem, libro 3. de veritate corporis & sanguinis Domini contra Berengarium: Nunc, inquit, contra illos habenda est ratio qui Ecclesiae rationibus expugnati, jam quidem negare nequeunt substantiam corporis Christi cibo inesse Dominico; panem tamen & vinum per verba Salvatoris in carnem ejus & sanguinem verti nequaquam credentes, sed Christum PANI ET VINO COMMISCENTES, tanquam subtiliori ratione, HÆRESIN ALTERAM condiderunt. … Quapropter … nec alias ipsi afferant, quae insania est, ut Christum, ut ita dixerim, sua autoritate IMPANENT ET INVINENT. … At IMPANARI & INVINARI Christum, nulla … expetit ratio, nec Prophetae praedixerunt, nec Christus ostendit, nec Apostoli praedicaverunt, nec mundus, exceptis his paucissimis HÆRETICIS, credidit. … Christus enim isti IMPANATUM ET INVINATUM annunciant … Hos IMPANATORES suos ipse Dominus Jesus ore suo interficit cum accipiens panem … ait, Hoc est Corpus meum; non ait: IN HOC LATET corpus meum; nec dixit: IN HOC vino est sanguis meus.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.