A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §343

Annotatio I §.IV: Do not confuse proposition-propriety with real supernatural presence and manducation

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Do not mix the propriety of Christ’s Eucharistic proposition with the question of real substantial presence and manducation in the Supper.

Deny propriety of the words, and you still have not denied real presence or eating — the first fight is logical (words/terms); the second metaphysical (the thing).

This bread is my body can be improper while Christ’s body is truly present and eaten supernaturally and spiritually (John 6; 1 Cor. 10) — just as asserting propriety alone does not prove that presence.

Latin

Ad quas tamen Reformatorum doctorum Interpretationes propositionis Eucharisticae, oppidò annotandum est: Non confundendam hic quaestionem de proprietate vel improprietate propositionis Christi Eucharisticae, cum quaestione, sive de praesentia, sive de manducatione corporis Christi, in Coena, reali ac substantiali: neque enim ex negata Priori, i. e. ex negata proprietate verborum, rectè infertur posterioris negatio i. e. negatio praesentiae & manducationis realis. Prior negatio verba spectat & terminos, seu propositionem ex verbis & terminis confiatam; posterior rem ipsam hujusque attributa. Prior, formaliter accepta, Logica magis, posterior verò magis Metaphysica. Propositio Christi: Hoc, i. e. hic panis est corpus meum, potest esse impropria, etiamsi corpus Christi, quod impropriè de pane hoc loco praedicatur, propriè, i. e. reverâ in Eucharistia & praesens sit & manducetur, supernaturali scilicet & spirituali nobisque imperceptibili modo. Sicuti enim, non per solam propositionis Christi assertam proprietatem, corpus ejus in Coena supernaturali modo praesens asseritur reque ipsâ manducari, ita nec per solam propositionis ejusdem negatam proprietatem, corpus ejus supernaturali modo vel praesens, vel re ipsâ manducari negatur. Praesentia pariter ac manducatio corporis Christi supernaturales & spirituales, eaeque quàm maximè reales & substantiales, (unicum illum à Christo definitum praesentiae & manducationis corporis sui, tàm intra, quàm extra Eucharistiam, modum designantes) ex cap. 6. Johan. & 1. Cor. 10. satis superque intelliguntur & citra omnem controversiam admittuntur, etiamsi propositio Institutionis S. Coenae definitiva: Hoc est corpus meum, ad modum definitivarum Sacramentalium omnium, impropria seu figurata ac tropica defendatur.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.