A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §321

Annotatio I §.I Calixtus: Eucharist deformed by papal abuses — reformers right, but weak foresight at the start

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Calixtus notes the occasion of that first priority without tastelessness: among the Pontificians the Eucharist had been deformed by foul abuses and superstitions — scarcely any other head of religion had suffered equal calamity.

They adored the blessed bread as the very Body, set it out for adoration, and offered a propitiatory sacrifice; solitary Masses without communicants were frequent.

The first Reformation leaders rightly meant to abolish those errors — yet human ingenuity is weak, and not all foresaw at the start how it would be done rightly (Judic. §.47, Dutch ed. pp. 69–70).

Latin

Prioris Prioritatis occasionem non insulsè annotat B. Georg. Calixtus hisce verbis: Sacramentum Eucharistiae multis & tetris abusibus & superstitionibus hactenus apud Pontificios deformatum erat & vix aliud religionis caput parem calamitatem expertum: Panem benedictum abusu remoto, quod nihil nisi ipsumissimum corpus crederent esse, adorabant & vulgò adorandum proponebant, quin & sacrificium propitiatorium (vocabulo hôc strictè & in formali significatione accepto) habebant & offerebant. Atque adeo Missas ut vocant solitarias, Communicantium expertes, frequentissimè celebrabant, rarò autem adhibitis Communicantibus. Hisce erroribus & pravitatibus abolendis intenti erant primi Reformationis duces & Autores, quod omnino rectè erat; quae est autem humani ingenii imbecillitas, quomodo id rectè fieret, non omnes in istis initiis providebant, Judic. de controversiis theologicis §.47. Batav. ed. p. 69. in fine & 70.

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.