A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §157

§.XIII: Affirmative on both — Crocius, Ausführliche Behauptung, Pauli, Faculty Senior vs Liebhard; Diet 1566

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

On both questions — especially the second, which must presuppose and imply the first — the affirmative is true.

Joh. Crocius proved it at length in the German tract already cited and in his denser Commentary, question 2; so did the author of the Ausführliche Behauptung, pp. 90–111; Georgius Pauli in the Reformatus Augustanus; and the venerable Senior of our faculty against Liebhard in chapters 4 and 6 entire.

Among other proofs they lean chiefly on the Augsburg Diet of 1566 (treated most fully by Crocius, Comm. Cap. 18), Cap. 4 §.8 p. 102;

Latin

Utriusque, cumprimis posterioris, affirmativam veram & prioris Veritatem necessariò supponentem inferentemque, prolixius evicerunt Joh. Crocius, Tractatu Germanico suprâ allegato, & Commentario suo spissiori, quaestione secunda, Auctor item der ausführlichen Behauptung à pag. 90. ad 111., Georgius Pauli in Reformato Augustano, & Venerandus Facultatis nostrae Senior contra Liebhardum cap. 4. & sexto integris, inter alias probationes, maximè ex Comitio Anni 1566. Augustano (de quo prolixissimè Joh. Crocius cit. Comment. Cap. 18.) Cap. 4. §. 8. pag. 102.;

About this text

Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.

English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.