Prefatio Crimina III §.VIII opening: The Sandomierz cruelty charge and the Synod's clash with a single contradictor
§. VIII.
But we hasten on to the THIRD and greatest of all the CRIMINATIONS — belonging almost solely to my first and most vehement Accuser — who, alas!, indulges too much his envy and his unjust and tumultuous zeal, by which he is rather often carried off into various things less becoming a Christian man, especially a theologian, so that not seldom he appears to have laid down his shield even in the most manifest distortions. He takes it ill that I set forth and recommended the Sandomierz Consensus as an Example of the Ecclesiastical Union of Evangelicals — than which none more excellent is given, and by which the Polish Evangelicals once coalesced so closely that they all but held every sacred thing in common, and neither Reformed living among Lutherans nor Lutherans living among Reformed feared, when occasion was given, to use and enjoy one another's sacred Sermons and Administrations of the Sacraments, while for the rest they proposed to one another, where need was, the most modest discriminations of beyond-fundamental Doctrines, without any party detractions, through charitable informations and conferences — persisting most amicably in such Consociation for more than half a century (as we proved by a just computation of the time from when the Consensus began to when it was afterward disrupted by certain well-known Firebrands, in the Preface vindicating the Consensus and prefixed to its repeated Edition).
Accordingly, that he might hurt me, the Adversary arraigns both the Sandomierz Consensus and me its Herald as guilty of utterly monstrous Cruelty and Tyranny, on this sole ground: that when a certain Contradictor interposed against this Consensus — and after the Synod had dealt with him both publicly and privately, as one reclaiming against the Consensus and unwilling to foster Concord with the other Churches — a certain tumult arose (as Hartknoch reports), and he experienced the threats of a certain Polish Politician, made with the scimitar after the manner of the Nation.
Yet even without my reminding him, anyone sufficiently understands that nothing can fall away from or be detracted from the Consensus of so many Evangelical Churches, unanimously entered, and from its just praises, merely because one sole Pastor reclaimed against it; nor can the whole Synod, otherwise peaceably agreeing, justly be charged with cruelty because, when a large enough handle had been given by the obstinate contradiction of one man shouting against all, some one of the Nobles — especially of the Poles, among whom liberty sometimes degenerates into Polish license — threatened him with the scimitar beyond the mind and will of the Synod.
Latin
§. VIII. Sed ad TERTIAM omniumque maximam properamus CRIMINATIONEM, soli fere primo eique vehementissimo Criminatori meo propriam, qui — proh dolor! — livori suo injustoque ac tumultuanti zelo, quo saepiuscule ad varia Christianum Hominem, praecipue Theologum, minus decentia abripitur, nimium indulget, ut haud rarenter in manifestissimis etiam detorsionibus clypeum suum reposuisse appareat. Hunc aegre habet, quod in Exemplum Unionis Evangelicorum Ecclesiasticae, Sendomiriensem Consensum posuerim ac commendaverim, quo praestantior non datur alter, quove tam arcte coaluerant olim Evangelici Poloni, ut tantum non quaevis Sacra communia haberent, et tam Reformati inter Lutheranos, quam hi istos inter viventes, mutuis Partis alterius Concionibus Sacris Sacramentorumque Administrationibus, data occasione, uti fruique nulli vererentur, de cetero Doctrinarum praeter-Fundamentalium discrimina modestissima et citra Partium obtrectationes quascunque, per charitativas informationes collationesque, mutuo sibi, ubi opus erat, proponerent, in hujusmodi Consociatione (quod Praefatione, Consensum vindicante, et Editioni ejus iteratae praemissa, per justam temporis, quo Consensus coepit quove per notissimos quosdam Incentores disruptus postliminio est, computationem, dedimus probatum) ultra Seculi dimidium, amicissime persistentes. Proinde, ut mihi aegre faceret Adversarius, tam Consensum Sendomiriensem, quam me, ejus Praeconem, immanis prorsus Crudelitatis et Tyrannidis, eo solo nomine, reos peragit, quod Consensui huic Contradictor quidam intercedens, postquam cum hoc, Consensui reclamante et Concordiam cum caeteris Ecclesiis fovere nolente, tam publice quam privatim, a Synodo actum esset, tumultu quodam (ut refert Hartknochius) exorto, Politici cujusdam Poloni minas, pro more Gentis, acinace factas, expertus sit. Etsi vero, me minus monente, quilibet satis intelligat, tot Evangelicarum Ecclesiarum Consensui, unanimiter inito, hujusque justis laudibus, per id decedére nihil aut detrahi posse, quod unus solus Pastor eidem reclamaverit, nec crudelitatis tota Synodus, pacifice alioquin consentiens, jure argui propterea queat, quod data larga satis, per obstinatam unius, omnibus obstrepentis, contradictionem, ansa, Nobilium quispiam, praesertim Polonorum, pro libertate, in licentiam quandoque degenerante Polonica, praeter mentem et voluntatem Synodi, isti acinace minatus sit;
About this text
Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.
English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio section I tip (Schrey & Hartmann 1708) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio §II + Crimina heads + Part I Protheoria densify (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio Crimina defenses densify (IV + Crimina I–II opening) (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina defenses pages 44-56 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Crimina II rem + Crimina III + Cassel Art. III–V densify (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 57-75 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 56-75 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Obices/Officia/Historia/gradus densify (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria body pages 114-120 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Formula Discord / Digressio / Bossuet / Disparitas densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Coena Domini body start densify (Q.I–II / Precariae Hypotheses) (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Post Lutherum Providentia Controv. III opening densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Post Lutherum pages 141-155 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Post Lutherum pages 141-144 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. VI Reprobation densify (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Prooemium PDF pages 179-186 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Hexades Prooemium pages 182-186 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.I–§.IV densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 186-198 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Hexades Annotatio I pages 186-193 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.V–§.VII densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 192-205 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.VIII densify (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.