Prefatio Crimina I posterior J.VI: The Beza–Calvin heaven-from-earth charge answered from the Scultetus letter
J. VI.
The POSTERIOR PART of the FIRST CRIMINATION — by which the accuser said I had written that Christ's Body is farther distant from the Holy Supper and from the blessed bread of the Holy Supper than the heaven of heavens is from the terraqueous globe — is convicted of the most open falsehood by the mere repetition of my own words by which I am judged to have so written. For thus the words of my Letter written to Scultetus run:
I for my part take it upon myself in turn to require and solicit you, most distinguished Scultetus — you who have solicited me about many things and obtained my assent — that both you and the venerable Calixtus may judge the sincere and clear mind of the Reformed in this cause to be that which one of you adduced from blessed Calvin's Institutes, Book IV, chapter 17, section 9, in these words: Whatever can serve to express the true and Substantial Communication of the Lord's Body and Blood, which is exhibited to the Faithful by the Sacred Symbols of the Supper, I gladly receive — and that in such a way that they are understood to perceive it not with imagination alone or the intelligence of the mind, but to enjoy it in very deed as food of eternal life. Reconcile the harder voice of Calvin commonly Beza, thrust out precipitately in the Consensus with the Zurichers as Doctor Calixtus says — that the Body and Blood of our Savior are at that time, when the Sacred Eucharist is administered, distant from us by as great an interval of places as heaven is situated from earth — with the immediately recited words of the same Calvin, so that there he may be held to have spoken of the Crucified Body of Christ, and here of the Glorious. The Glorious, or Glorified, Body of Christ, according to the Sentence of Calvin and the Reformed, is in the heavens, sitting there at the right hand of the Father, to return thence to judge the living and the dead; but the Crucified Body of Christ is most present in the Eucharist. For this is the sincere and clear Sentence of the Reformed concerning the Lord's Supper which I dare to weigh in the name of them all: that All Believers who receive and manducate the blessed Bread receive and manducate the Crucified Body of Christ; and that the same account holds of the consecrated Wine; but that the Mode by which it comes about that Christ's crucified Body and His shed Blood are really present to Believers in the Sacred Supper and are in very deed received, eaten, and drunk by them, we do not know, and that that Mode is Hyperphysical.
Did I then truly assert that Christ's Body is farther distant from the Holy Supper and the blessed bread of the Holy Supper than the heaven of heavens is from the terraqueous globe? When, namely, I asserted: (1) that the Crucified Body of Christ is most present in the Supper; (2) that this is the sincere and clear Sentence of the Reformed concerning the Lord's Supper — that All Believers who receive and manducate the blessed bread receive and manducate Christ's crucified Body, and that the same account holds of the consecrated wine; (3) that the Mode alone by which it comes about that Christ's crucified Body and His shed Blood are really present to Believers in the Holy Supper, and are in very deed received, eaten, and drunk by them, we do not know; and that that Mode is Hyperphysical.
Let it be permitted to add now: even if perhaps the Lutheran Doctors universally all hold which nevertheless I would somewhat doubt that Christ's Body which is now present in the Supper is Christ's glorified Body, and therefore, as to qualities, other than that which was present to the disciples in the first Supper — that is, humbled and near to Crucifixion, or about to be crucified — called by Christ Himself given didomenon (Luke 22:19), and by Paul broken klomenon (1 Corinthians 11:24) — contrary to what I hold, who have asserted that Christ's Body, as crucified more than as glorified, is present in the Holy Supper Substantialiter nevertheless, though Spiritualiter; by that very fact, because I most clearly maintained in one and the same place that Christ's crucified Body, as crucified, is present in its Substance Spiritually, that is, and therefore Sacramentally in every Holy Supper — by what face, I ask, can I be said to have opined that Christ's Body is farther distant from the blessed bread of the Holy Supper than the heaven of heavens from the terraqueous globe? Nor does it obstruct that I meanwhile believe, led by the Apostles' Creed, that Christ's Body ascended into heaven, sits there at the right hand of God the Father, and will someday return thence to judge the living and the dead. For I believe all this, with very many Lutherans, concerning the Corporal, Local, and Dimensional Presence of Christ's Body in Heaven, having never denied the Spiritual and therefore Sacramental Presence of the same Body of Christ in the Holy Supper, but most sincerely, with God granting, ready to confess it to the last breath of life.
Latin
J. VI. POSTERIOR CRIMINATIONIS PRIMAE PARS, qua incusor scripsisse: Corpus Christi a S. Coena benedictoque S. Coenae pane, longius distare, quam Caeli Caelorum a Terraqueo globo distant, sola repetitione verborum meorum, quibus ita scripsisse judicor, apertissimi falsi convincitur. Sic enim verba Epistolae meae, ad Scultetum exaratae, habent: Ego Te, Clarissime Scultete, qui me de pluribus sollicitasti assensumque impetrasti, vicissim requirendum sollicitandumque mihi sumo, quo et Tu, et Venerandus Calixtus, Reformatorum animi Sententiam sinceram ac dilucidam, hac in causa, eam arbitremini esse, quam ex B. Calvini Inst. Lib. IV. cap. 17. §. 9. alter Vestrum adduxit l. c. his verbis: Quicquid ad exprimendam veram Substantialemque Corporis ac Sanguinis Domini Communicationem, quae, Sacris Coenae Symbolis, Fidelibus exhibetur, facere potest, libenter recipio: Atque ita, ut non cum imaginatione duntaxat aut mentis intelligentia percipere, sed ut re ipsa frui in alimentum vitae aeternae, intelligantur. Duriorem a. in Consensu cum Tigurinis praecipitanter (ut D. Calixto dicitur) protrusam Calvini (vulgo Beza) vocem hanc: Quod Corpus Sanguisque Servatoris Nostri a nobis tunc, quando Sacra administratur Eucharistia, tanto locorum intervallo distet, quanto Caelum a Terra sita, cum proxime recitatis ejusdem Calvini verbis concilietis, ut ibi de Crucifixo, hic de Glorioso Corpore Christi locutus perhibeatur. Gloriosum, seu Glorificatum Christi Corpus, ex Sententia Calvini et Reformatorum, in Caelis est, ibidem sedens ad dextram Patris, inde rediturum ad judicandum vivos et mortuos; at Crucifixum Corpus Christi in Eucharistia praesentissimum est. Sincera enim haec et dilucida Reformatorum (quod nomine eorum omnium ponderare audeo) de Coena Domini Sententia est: Omnes Credentes, qui accipiunt et manducant benedictum Panem, accipere et manducare Corpus Christi Crucifixum: Consecrati Vini eadem ratio sit; Modum autem, quo id fiat, ut Corpus Christi crucifixum et Sanguis ejus effusus, in Coena Sacra, Credentibus realiter praesentia sint et ab his re vera accipiantur, edantur bibanturque, nos ignorare, esseque Modum illum Hyperphysicum. Itane vero asserui, Corpus Christi a S. Coena benedictoque S. Coenae pane longius distare, quam Caeli Caelorum a Terraqueo globo distant? Quando scil. asserui: (1) Crucifixum Corpus Christi in Coena praesentissimum esse. (2) Sinceram hanc et dilucidam Reformatorum de Coena Domini Sententiam esse: Omnes Credentes, qui accipiunt et manducant benedictum panem, accipere et manducare Corpus Christi crucifixum, vinique consecrati eandem rationem esse. (3) Modum solum, quo id fiat, ut Corpus Christi crucifixum et Sanguis ejus effusus in Coena S., Credentibus realiter praesentia sint, et ab his re vera accipiantur, edantur bibanturque, nos ignorare; esse vero Modum illum Hyperphysicum. Addere nunc liceat, etiamsi fortean Lutherani Doctores in universum omnes (quod tamen subdubitaverim) teneant, Corpus Christi, quod nunc in Coena praesens est, esse Christi Corpus glorificatum, eoque, qua qualitates, aliud ab eo, quod in prima Coena discipulis adfuit, i.e. humiliatum et Crucifixioni proximum, seu crucifigendum, ab ipso Christo διδόμενον (Luke 22:19), a Paulo κλώμενον (1 Corinthians 11:24) appellatum — secus ac ego teneo, qui Corpus Christi, quatenus crucifixum, magis quam quatenus glorificatum idem est, in Coena S. (Substantialiter tamen, licet Spiritualiter) adesse asserui; Eo interim ipso, quia crucifixum Corpus Christi, quatenus crucifixum est, in omni Coena S., Substantia sua (Spiritualiter scil. eoque Sacramentaliter) praesens esse plo una vice ibidem disertissime perhibui, qua fronte, quaeso, dici possum opinatus, Corpus Christi a benedicto pane S. Coenae, longius distare quam Caeli Caelorum a Terraqueo globo? Nec obstat: me interim, duce Symbolo Apostolico, credere, Corpus Christi ascendisse in caelum, ibidem ad dexteram Dei Patris sedere, indeque rediturum aliquando ad judicandum vivos et mortuos. Hoc enim omne, cum plurimis Lutheranis, credo de Corporali, Locali, Dimensionalique Corporis Christi in Caelo Praesentia, Spiritualem eoque Sacramentalem ejusdem Corporis Christi in Coena S. nunquam inficiatus, sed sincerissime, bono cum Deo, ad extremum usque vitae halitum, confessurus.
About this text
Samuel Strimesius — Prefatio through Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. III-XIII + XV Tolerantia, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium and Annotatio I through Decem Theses / Francus plus Annotatio II §.I-§.VI and Annotatio III §.I–§.VII (through Cassellanum 1661) from Ingenua in Controversias Evangelicorum (Frankfurt an der Oder, 1708). Honest partial; Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio III §.VIII+ fruits / §.IX+, Hexades theses body, deeper Controversiae / Part II remain.
English follows the locked 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. III–XV tip (providence through De Tolerantia mutua; Controv. print pp. 40–78), Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III (Hexades print pp. 1–4 / PDF ~182–185), and Annotatio I De Augustana Confessione §.I–§.VIII tip (Hexades print pp. 5–24+ / PDF ~186–205+), reconstructed from Google Books PDF page images (ONB copy, id 3epYAAAAcAAJ) with pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only. Prefatio silence reasons, Annotatio I §.IX+, Hexades theses body beyond §.VIII, and remainder of Controversiae / folio remain.
Witnesses
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio section I tip (Schrey & Hartmann 1708) (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio §II + Crimina heads + Part I Protheoria densify (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Prefatio Crimina defenses densify (IV + Crimina I–II opening) (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina defenses pages 44-56 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Crimina II rem + Crimina III + Cassel Art. III–V densify (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 57-75 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Prefatio Crimina II–III pages 56-75 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Obices/Officia/Historia/gradus densify (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria body pages 114-120 (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Formula Discord / Digressio / Bossuet / Disparitas densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Coena Domini body start densify (Q.I–II / Precariae Hypotheses) (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Post Lutherum Providentia Controv. III opening densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Post Lutherum pages 141-155 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Post Lutherum pages 141-144 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. VI Reprobation densify (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotationum Prooemium H.I–§.III densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Prooemium PDF pages 179-186 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Hexades Prooemium pages 182-186 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.I–§.IV densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 186-198 (Latin)
- Checked print Tesseract Hexades Annotatio I pages 186-193 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.V–§.VII densify (Latin)
- Checked print pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 192-205 (Latin)
- Copy-text Locked Latin, Hexades Annotatio I §.VIII densify (Latin)
This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.