On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §86

Cap. VIII: VI Ex vs.19 — same imputation? Deny the minor

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

VI. But perhaps that thesis will finally surface from verse 19: "As through one man's disobedience many were constituted sinners, so through one man's obedience many will be constituted righteous" (Romans 5:19). In no way. D. Garissoles argues from it in more than one form, and first thus: the Apostle in this verse is doing what he had pursued more diffusely in those earlier ones; but in this verse he plainly treats imputation; therefore the earlier verses must be understood of the same imputation. I answer the minor: in this verse the Apostle is not treating imputation; or if he is, he is not treating immediate or antecedent imputation — the only kind I deny. For if he is doing in this verse what he did in the earlier ones, where it was plain he was not treating that imputation, it follows that he is not treating that imputation in this verse either.

Latin

VI. Sed fortasse illa tandem aliquando emerget ex verf. 19. Sicut per unius inobedientiam peccatores constituti sunt multi, ita per unius obedientiam justi constituentur multi: Nullo certe modo. Argumentatur ex eo D. G. non uno modo, & primo quidem sic. Idem Apostolus agit hoc versu quod reliquis illis diffusiùs prosecutus fuerat. Atqui hoc versu manifeste agit de imputatione. Ergo & de eadem imputatione superiora intelligenda sunt. Respondeo ad minorem, Apostolum hoc versu non agere de imputatione: aut si agit de imputatione, non agere de imputatione immediata seu antecedente, quam solam nego. Nam si idem agit hoc versu quod in superioribus, in quibus de ista imputatione eum non egisse patuit, consequens est, eum de ista imputatione non agere in isto versu.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.