On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §700

Man. Post. Cap. X tip — Christ’s cross-merit comes by free imputation, not by the Deuteronomy hanging-law

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

For there was no law which ordered that Christ be driven to the cross; nor is the imputation to us of the obedience rendered by Christ on that cursed cross according to that law, or according to law, but from mere grace, according to the promises of the Gospel.

Latin

Nulla enim lex fuit quae iuberet Christum in crucem agi, nec sic nobis imputatio obedientiae a Christo in maledicta illa cruce praestitae est secundum illam legem, aut secundum legem, sed ex mera gratia, secundum promissiones Evangelii.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.