On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §672

Man. Post. Cap. X: PLAC — then only reatus? Show ἁμαρτία used for bare guilt in Scripture

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Guilt? Therefore by the sin which lasted in the world until the law, bare guilt alone is to be understood.

Let there be given us, then, some place from the New Testament in which ἁμαρτία is used for bare guilt alone; or at least some place from the Old, where it is so used when God’s judgment is in view.

For why in this place should that word, so frequent, be taken in a sense altogether unused?

This first.

Latin

Reatus? Igitur per peccatum quod usque ad legem duravit in mundo, solus reatus intelligendus est. Detur igitur nobis locus aliquis e Novo Testamento in quo ἁμαρτία pro solo reatu usurpetur; aut detur saltem aliquis e Veteri, ubi sic usurpetur, cum de Dei iudicio agitur. Cur enim hoc loco vox illa, tam frequens, acciperetur sensu prorsus inusitato? Hoc primum.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.