On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §625

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — imputation when not yet separate persons; reckoned as one man in Adam

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

That imputation was therefore made when we were not yet persons separate and distant from Adam—or, as the one I was dealing with puts it, when we were considered by God as one man in Adam. Now, I think, you yourself, reader, sufficiently see what force the argument has.

Latin

Facta est igitur ista imputatio cum nondum essemus personae separatae & distantes ab Adamo: vel, ut loquitur is quicum mihi res erat, cum consideraremus a Deo tanquam unus homo in Adamo. Nunc, opinor, quam vim habeat argumentum, ipse per te, Lector, satis intelligis.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.