On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §622

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC tip — will explain; does not impugn mediate/consequent imputation after corruption

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

PLAC. Since the learned man could not see the force of this reason, I will explain it. Let the reader remember, if he will, that I am not attacking mediate or consequent imputation, which is later than each one's existence and corruption.

Latin

PLAC. Quandoquidem videre huius rationis vim Vir doctus non potuit, eam explicabo. Meminerit igitur, Lector, si placet, me non impugnare imputationem mediatam seu consequentem, quae cuiusque existentia & corruptione posterior est.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.