On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §589

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — how that aids antecedent imputation unclear (pp. 151–153)

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

PLAC. How that was said before, and how much it favors antecedent imputation, we judge to appear sufficiently from what was said above at pages 151, 152, 153. Whither therefore this reply of the learned man pertains, and what force it has, I do not understand.

Latin

PLAC. Quomodo id antea fuerit dictum, & quantum faveat imputationi antecedenti, satis patere arbitramur ex dictis supra pag. 151. 152. 153. Quorsum igitur pertineat, & quam vim habeat haec Viri docti responsio, non intelligo.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.