On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §586

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC tip — fights pre-existence imputation; tip before GAR 4 (act+corruption)

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Which he cannot answer me, because, as I have already observed, I oppose the imputation which is believed to have long been, before we began to be. And by that imputation it was brought about that we truly and properly became sinners and guilty.

Latin

Id quod mihi respondere non potest, quoniam, ut iam observavi, imputationem oppugno quae diu fuisse creditur, antequam esse inciperemus, & qua factum sit ut vere & proprie peccatores & rei fieremus.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.