On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §581

Man. Post. Cap. IX: GAR — Pelagian telum: sin-in-Adam = hereditary corruption?

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

GAR. 3. But the Pelagian also will seize a dart, and will twist it against us. For where the Apostle says that we have sinned in Adam, what does the learned man understand by the word sin? Hereditary corruption, that original vice of ours, and inborn in us. And so to have sinned in Adam will be to have been corrupt and vitiated in Adam.

Latin

GAR. 3. Sed & Pelagianus telum arripiet, & in nos contorquebit. Nam ubi dicit Apostolus nos in Adamo peccasse, quid intelligit Vir doctus peccati voce? Corruptionem haereditariam, vitium illud originale nostrum, & nobis ingenitum. Itaque in Adamo peccasse, erit in Adamo corruptos & vitiatos esse.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.