On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §529

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — omit → no corruption or Paul missed his scope; Pelagians win

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

The other, either that that corruption is nothing, or that the Apostle wandered from his aim. If the former, the Pelagians have won, and free choice is still intact. The latter is plain.

Latin

Alterum, aut eam corruptionem nullam esse, aut Apostolum aberrasse a suo scopo. Si prius, vicerunt Pelagiani, estque adhuc in integro liberum arbitrium. Posterius patet.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.