On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §514

Man. Post. Cap. IX: PLAC — Isa verb/penalty; tip before imputatum-est reductio

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

The place Isaiah 53. 6. is not to the point, both because it is not the same verb: for hiphgia is not 'he made to enter' or 'to go in,' but 'he made to meet,' or 'to fall upon'; and because iniquity in that place signifies not the sin itself, but the penalty of sin. For it met Christ, falls upon him, rushes upon him, and, if you will, entered into him—not sin, but only the penalty of sin. But here sin is distinguished from the penalty of sin: for there follows, and through sin death. And so it cannot be proved that it can be the same, for sin to enter into someone, and for sin to be imputed to someone. But if sin, insofar as it is distinguished from penalty, entered into Christ, what is there why Christ could not have been called a sinner? If this is absurd, that also must be confessed to be absurd.

Latin

Locus Esai. LIII. 6. ad rem non est, tum quia non est idem verbum: הִפְגִּיעַ enim non est fecit ingredi seu introire, sed fecit occurrere, vel incurrere; tum quia iniquitas eo loco non ipsum peccatum, sed poenam peccati significat. Occurrit enim Christo, incurrit, irruit in eum, &, si ita vis, intravit in eum non peccatum, sed sola peccati poena. Hic autem peccatum a peccati poena distinguitur: sequitur enim, & per peccatum mors. Itaque probari non potest idem esse posse, peccatum in aliquem ingredi, & peccatum alicui imputari. Quod si peccatum, quatenus a poena distinguitur, ingressum est in Christum, quid est cur Christus non potuerit dici peccator? Si hoc est absurdum, illud quoque absurdum esse confitendum est.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.