On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §487

Man. Post. Cap. IX: even if actual — entered by venom, not imputation

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Grant nevertheless that it is so understood; I will deny that that sin entered into the world by imputation. Rather it is said to have entered into the world, because he left his venom in Adam, which without that kind of imputation crept from Adam into Seth, from Seth into Enosh, from him into Kenan, and so little by little flowed from father into sons, until it reached us by natural propagation and multiplication.

Latin

Fac tamen intelligi; negabo peccatum illud introiisse in mundum per imputationem: sed dici introiisse in mundum, quia suum venenum reliquit in Adamo, quod sine eiusmodi imputatione serpsit ab Adamo in Sethum, à Setho in Enosch, ab hoc in Kenanem, & ita paulatim à patre in filios manavit, donec ad nos perveniret propagatione & multiplicatione naturali.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.