On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §485

Man. Post. Cap. IX: Respondeo — παράπτωμα vs other names; deny major/minor

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

I answer that the name paraptoma must be distinguished from the other two: For by that one the Apostle sometimes designates Adam's sin, sometimes the vice arisen from Adam's sin in all humans: By these he signifies only Adam's sin, not indeed the actual cut off from the habitual, but together with the habitual. And so as far as this name paraptoma is concerned, I deny the Major: but as far as the other two, I deny the minor.

Latin

Respondeo distinguendum esse nomen παράπτωμα à duobus aliis: Illo enim Apostolus modo peccatum Adami, modo vitium ex peccato Adami in omnibus hominibus ortum designat: His solum peccatum Adami significat, non quidem actuale praecisum ab habituali, sed simul cum habituali. Itaque quantum ad hoc nomen παράπτωμα attinet, nego Maiorem: quantum vero ad alia duo, nego minorem.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.