On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §232

Man. Post. Cap. IV: GAR 1 — velle / nolle

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Garissoles' first reason. Things are not one and the same if a man can at once will the one and refuse the other. So here: Adam, eating the forbidden fruit, meant to break God's command, yet did not mean to lose his righteousness and privileges.

Latin

GAR. Etenim 1. non unum idemque sunt, quorum unum idem homo eodem tempore velle potest, & alterum nolle. At ita habet in hac causa. Adamus enim de fructu interdicto comedens, volebat violare Dei praeceptum, sed nolebat justitiam suam & praerogativas amittere.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.