On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §193

Man. Post. Cap. II GAR: Deinde — habitus left in Adam how our hereditary sin?

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Garissoles: Next—by what account can that habit left in Adam's soul be called our hereditary sin? Has that habit in Adam's soul not long since ceased to exist? How then can it still be, or inhere in us as in a subject? How can one single habit—one and the same accident in number—pass into so many different subjects, nearly infinite?

Latin

GAR. Deinde, qua ratione habitus ille in Adami anima relictus, dici potest peccatum nostrum haereditarium? habitus ille in Adami anima, nonne diu est cum esse desiit? Quomodo igitur esse amplius potest, aut nobis subjective inhaerere? imo qui fieri potest, ut unicus habitus, id est unum idemque numero accidens, in tam diversa, adeoque infinita pene subjecta transeat?

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.