On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §176

Man. Post. Cap. II §XIV: Garissoles 2 / Placeus — in ipso contradiction invented

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Garissoles: (2) How can these be reconciled? "Adam's sin is imputed to us not as it stuck in him," and "Adam's sin is imputed to us as it was lasting viciousness in him"—for what difference is there here between "sticking in Adam" and "being lasting in Adam"? I do not see. Placeus: The proposition "Adam's sin is imputed to us not as it stuck in him" is mine; the opposite, "Adam's sin is imputed to us as it was lasting viciousness in him," is not. The words "in him," which create the contradiction, he did not find in my writings; the learned man added them here from his own stock. Nor do they appear in the exposition of my view that he himself had set out earlier in §x. So he made and invented that contradiction and falsely pinned it on me.

Latin

GAR. 2. Quomodo ista componi possunt inter se? Peccatum Adae imputatur nobis, non qua haesit in ipso, & peccatum Adae imputatur nobis qua fuit vitiositas permanens in ipso: nam haerere in Adamo, & esse permanens in Adamo, quid hic differant, ego quidem non video. PLAC. Propositio, Peccatum Adae imputatur nobis, non qua haesit in ipso, mea quidem est; sed illi opposita, Peccatum Adae imputatur nobis qua fuit vitiositas permanens in ipso, mea non est. Voces enim in ipso, quae contradictionem efficiunt, non invenit in meis scriptis, sed de suo Vir doctus addidit hoc loco: neque vero illae comparent in sententiae meae expositione quam ipse praemiserat § x. Contradictionem igitur istam ipse fecit ac finxit, mihique falso tribuit.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.