On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §174

Man. Post. Cap. II §XIV: Garissoles — subject distinction; 2nd vs 3rd coincide

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Garissoles: But in this distinction of the subject as well there are points that, well weighed, can scarcely be approved. For (1) what is gained by distinguishing the second sense of Adam's sin from the third, when whatever is said here of Adam's sin in the second sense is claimed to fit it in reality not as a passing act but as habitual, lasting corruption? So Adam's sin in the second and third modes really coincides in the same thing.

Latin

GAR. Sed & in hac subjecti distinctione nonnulla continentur, quae bene perpendenti vix est ut probari valeant. Nam 1. Quo fructu secunda peccati Adae significatio distinguitur a tertia, cum quicquid de peccato Adae in secunda significatione hic dicitur, ei reapse convenire asseratur, non quatenus est actio transiens, sed quatenus est corruptio habitualis & permanens? Ita enim peccatum Adae secundo & tertio modo dictum in idem revera coincidunt.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.