On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §120

Cap. X: Bellarmine — free-action participation; Confession XI; reatus vs habit

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Bellarmine's proof runs: whatever we say clings in little children from sin — guilt, aversion, loss of grace, or anything else — cannot be vice in them, cannot even exist, unless it came from a free act in which they somehow shared. Is that not to deny that the hereditary blot in infants is truly sin enough to damn them, as our Confession states in Article XI? Let him continue. First: guilt is a relation that follows an act — how can it stand in someone who had no share in the act? The argument would hold if the only sin were actual sin, and the only guilt what follows an act at once. But there is also habitual sin, and guilt that follows a habit.

Latin

Eam probat Bellarminus, Nam, inquit, quicquid dicamus in parvulis ex peccato haerere, sive reatum, sive aversionem, sive gratiae privationem, sive quid aliud; nullo modo parvulis vitio dari, ac ne esse quidem poterit, nisi processerit ab actione libera, cujus actionis illi aliquomodo participes fuerint. Nonne hoc est negare, vitium haereditarium, infantibus inhaerens, esse vere peccatum iis damnandis sufficiens, uti nostra pronunciat Confessio Artic. XI. Sed pergat. Nam primo, reatus, cum sit relatio consequens actionem, qui fieri potest ut existat in eo, qui non est particeps actionis? Valeret sane hoc argumentum, si nullum esset peccatum nisi actuale, nullus reatus nisi proxime actionem consequens. Nunc autem est etiam peccatum habituale, & reatus consequens habitum.

About this text

Josue de la Place (Placeus) — Capita I–XIV partial of De imputatione primi peccati Adami from the 1661 Saumur Latin, through Man. Post. Caput X (GAR.1–3 Rom. 5.13 tip) / before PLAC on reatus-only. Honest partial; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

English follows the locked 1661 Saumur Latin of Capita I–XIV partial through Man. Post. Caput IX (eph-ho / eph-ho pantes) before eph-ho / eph-ho pantes, reconstructed from IA PDF page images with Vision OCR and pdftotext as check. No modern English was copied. Cap. IX deepen+ remain.

Catalogue & scope

IA deimputationepri00lapl. Densify: Capita I–XII + Caput XIV + Man. Post. Cap. II–VI through Cap. X Rom. 5:14 tip. Not whole Disputatio; Cap. X Rom. 5:14+ / ~494 pp Disputatio remain.

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.