Imperative for optative; breasts, breast, and little breast

Let him kiss me, then, with the kisses of his mouth. It is the custom of the Scriptures to put the imperative for the optative, as there: Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name! — for “would that it be hallowed”; and now in the present place: Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth, for “would that he kiss me.” Then she catches sight of the Bridegroom. He comes anointed with ointments; he could not come to the Bride otherwise, nor was it fitting that the Father should send the Son to the wedding otherwise. With varied ointments he anointed him and made him Christ. He comes breathing diverse fragrances and hears: For your breasts are better than wine. Fittingly the divine word names the same thing with different terms according to the character of the places. When a victim is offered in the law and the sense wants to show it, it says “the little breast of the separation.” But when someone reclines with Jesus and enjoys communion with his thoughts, it does not say “little breast,” as above, but “breast.” And when the Bride speaks to the Bridegroom, because a wedding song is being introduced, she does not name a little breast as in the sacrifice, nor a breast as in the disciple John, but breasts, saying: For your breasts are better than wine.