Theological Theses · §647

Roman doctors split: Jansenists deny any mere sufficient grace

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Roman doctors do not all agree on sufficient grace.

Some reject sufficient-vs-efficacious: no grace is sufficient unless efficacious.

They deny sufficient grace to all — for conversion or for avoiding sins — since efficacious grace is not given to all.

Jansenius and his disciples: this fits Augustine.

Latin

I. De hac quaestione non omnino convenit inter Doctores Ecclesiae Romanae. Primo enim sunt qui improbant distinctionem gratiae in sufficientem atque efficacem, nec volunt ullam esse gratiam sufficientem quae non sit efficax. Illi vero aperte docent non omnibus hominibus dari gratiam sufficientem sive ad conversionem, sive ad peccata vitanda; cum planum sit gratiam ad ista efficacem non omnibus dari. Quam sententiam tuentur Jansenius & ejus Discipuli, ut Augustini doctrinae conformem.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.