Theological Theses · §601

Why the distinction matters — strong feeling, weak object (and reverse)

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Watch the split: subjective max can meet objective near-zero.

Men often cling firmly to falsehoods or unfounded claims.

Conversely: object may deserve max certainty while assent is weak from mind’s fault.

Latin

III. Est autem haec distinctio apprime observanda. Nam quandoque certitudo subjectiva maxima est, ubi objectiva exigua, vel nulla: videlicet homines nimis quam saepe sibi firmiter persuadent ea quae, vel in se falsa sunt, vel quibus assentiendi nullum habent solidum & firmum fundamentum. Et contra ubi objectum certitudinem maximam exigit, debilis est mentis assensus, propter ejus aliquod vitium, aut defectum.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.