Theological Theses · §593

Object of praedestinatio — parallel opinion-splits in both Schools

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Effect-disputes and object-disputes travel together in both Schools.

Question: under what ratio/respect is man object to God predestining?

Nearly the same opinion-splits in Reformed and Roman Schools.

Latin

XXXII. Quemadmodum autem Theologi tum Ecclesiae Romanae, tum Ecclesiae Reformatae, de effectis electionis & praedestinationis varie philosophantur, sic apud utrosque judicia variant, nec parva reperitur opinionum diversitas circa praedestinationis & electionis objectum, id est, quum quaeritur sub qua ratione, & quo respectu homo praedestinanti Deo objiciatur. Eademque propemodum sententiarum discrimina quae inveniuntur in Schola Reformata, in Schola quoque Romana locum habent. Ut apparere potest repetenti quae supra dicta sunt.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.