Theological Theses · §410

Why not formal: they drag imperfection and clash in one subject

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Formal secundum quid would import imperfection — none in God.

Human/horse/ox natures and hot/cold cannot share one subject.

If formal in God, we could predicate them — we cannot.

Latin

XII. Quod in Deo proprie & formaliter non sint, est per se manifestum. Etenim, ut dictum est, notant & secum trahunt quandam imperfectionem. Sed in Deo nulla est imperfectio. Deinde perfectiones illae non possunt compatari omnes in eodem subjecto. Nec enim unum idemque potest simul habere naturam humanam, equinam, & bovinam. Et esse simul siccum & humidum, calidum & frigidum. Sed ista necessario constituunt diversas res, & requirunt diversa subjecta. Ac denique, si omnia ista in Deo formaliter essent, possent de eo dici & affirmari. Quod tamen falsum esse nemo non videt.

About this text

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu - Sedan Theological Theses, newly rendered from the 1675 London Latin. Covers De Theologia through Angelorum & Hominum Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII and Pars Secunda (Reformata) I-XL. Not the collected folio.

English follows locked Pitt Latin through Imaginum CLOSED + Sanctorum Cultu Romana CLOSED + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL. 1675 PDF ~384-390 (book ~370-376); Vision OCR + pdftotext + tess. No modern English. This slice densifies Sanctorum Pars Secunda I-XL. Next: Pars Secunda XLI–fin (~CI). Claim stays claimed (book densify not done).

Catalogue & scope

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves). Densify through Sanctorum Cultu Romana I-LXXVII + Pars Secunda Reformata I-XL (Pars Secunda not closed; not whole folio).

Witnesses

This is an AI-assisted study translation. Source fidelity and completeness have not been independently certified. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.